Degradation/De-motivation of Staff and Expecting world class Institute/Developed India??
Recent approval/orders of new recruitment rules for non-teaching staff in NIT system is very surprising, the entire recent rule indicate it has been made by those people who has no experience of such cadre or did not consulted with concern experts. There is not a single case of pay increase but they attempted to decrease the promotion period which seems good for example Assistant Registrar promotion period has been decreased from 8 years to 5 year which is good sign but another side to become Dy. Registrar they require 10 years contradictory to five years as per earlier rule/standard rule (Lolly Pop Given).
Librarian and Registrar post has been made on contractual/deputation etc. instead of regular on selection basis, Dy. and Asst. Librarians pay has been decreased and experience in year for higher position has been increased. Comparison between Registrar and Librarians cadre post clearly indicates main Administration and Heart of Institutes (Library) has been badly affected and it will have very poor impact on further development of Institute. I do not understand from where and how they will bring these manpower and what will be the quality of manpower if they found (Rejected non-selected candidates from many places however exception may be there, for example after 5 years Assistant Registrar/Librarians will generally become eligible for Dy. Registrar/Librarian as per requirement rule of Centrally/State funded university/institutes hence after 10 year as per NIT Rule i am sure they will get only rejected candidates maximum).
The said oversight committee seems intentionally/underestimated such administrative posts and their value. I do not understand how Institute of national importance will raise its status/ranking in world by decreasing the status and demoralizing/demotivating of their quality of current and future manpower. The post of Assistant Librarian require UGC-NET qualification but they have removed and placed in desirable with “preference will be given to UGC-NET candidate” indicates committee require UGC-NET qualify good candidates as per academic requirement/capability but they don’t want to give AGP 6000 as per rules.
I think People must raise such issues to MHRD not for their own benefit but for the benefit of entire system and country, i believe this is fault of those incapable people who have been given responsibility to improve but unfortunately they have disimproved the entire things. I have simply tried to compare in two cadre only but i am sure there are other cadre also who has been adversely effected with it.
Hence Librarian/SAC officers has been directly effected financially and by status in this rule and other cadres staff has been given slow poison which they will understand in future !!!by